Autot ja ajoneuvot

Figuring Out Why This Tesla Hit That Truck

Thanks to Omaze for sponsoring today's episode! You could win a 2018 DODGE DEMON and $20,000 cash through Omaze! ENTER:
As of 2020 Tesla has logged over 3 billion miles of autonomous vehicle driving. That’s over 120,000 laps around your momma. Like it or not, we can all agree that autonomous vehicles are the way of the future. Tesla, Cadillac, BMW, they're just a few companies that have cars on the market with autonomous features. But each of them tackle this "autonomous driving" problem in a different way using different technology. So how do they do it, how does it really work, and more importantly, is a computer in a car truly as responsive as the human brain? Well today we are gonna find out. Skynet is here.

New to the Channel?
►Watch this:
We upload almost every day, subscribe so you don't miss out!
►Subscribe here:
Click here for more info on joining the Donut Underground!
Shop Donut Merch:
Donut Media is at the center of digital media for the next generation of automotive and motorsports enthusiasts. We are drivers, drifters, and car enthusiasts who love to tell stories.


  1. ZeroTwo


    Tunti sitten

    autopilot can't override the drivers actions, if he had his foot of the pedal it would have went full on even if it knows it'll crash and if you crash in a Tesla you would have crashed anyways

  2. Lucas K

    Lucas K

    3 tuntia sitten

    4:38 - had I sipped my scalding coffee one second later it would have come out my nose. close call... careful out there coffee drinkers

  3. what kenyan

    what kenyan

    4 tuntia sitten

    In fact there was breaking but long before the car hit the semi if you look carefully when the car gets to that object that could be a person you see burn out like smoke emanating from it's tires.

  4. EV Vance

    EV Vance

    4 tuntia sitten

    Still on the driver tbh. Elon needs to stop telling people they can rely completely on autonomous vehicles

  5. peter müller

    peter müller

    6 tuntia sitten

    This reminds me of the time a Tesla crashed into a crossing truck, because there was too little contrast difference between a white truck and the sky in the background. I suspect this might have been a similar case? Although that doesn't explain why Tesla wouldn't have built in a self-check, aka "if the road (lane markers etc.) is missing in the picture, assume the camera is faulty, listen to your other sensors and disable autopilot", which while yes, is complicated, that really should be done...

  6. Swaraj


    8 tuntia sitten

    Car guys: "This is why we like out steering !!"

  7. The Great Foodini

    The Great Foodini

    8 tuntia sitten

    A 12 minute video for an idk? Wtf

  8. Yazeed Alateeq

    Yazeed Alateeq

    9 tuntia sitten

    For everyone whos watching the video for the answer... he didn't have one and it's a click bait

  9. dunhillsupramk3


    10 tuntia sitten

    not the 1st time a Tesla plowed itself into a truck, Tesla "autopilot" isn't a true autopilot but just a gimmick to sell cars to ppl who don't know better...

  10. Tau


    10 tuntia sitten

    Elon is right. LIDAR is a crutch. Obviously this wasn't the fault of optical sensors or you wouldn't see the truck on camera, because it wouldn't be detected by the camera; Obviously this isn't true. The thing that failed was the AI interpreting the information from the sensor rather then the type of sensor. The reason why LIDAR is a crutch is because you'll need optical sensors anyway to provide the AI with enough context to have some extent of situational awareness. And once an AI has situational awareness it doesn't need LIDAR anyway. LIDAR is a pitfall.

  11. Robin Binder

    Robin Binder

    11 tuntia sitten

    lmao this was 100% the drivers fault... he should have seen that semi at least from 200 metres. not a tasle fanboi btw. that driver should lose his license.

  12. Jose Martinez

    Jose Martinez

    15 tuntia sitten

    The reason the Tesla’s RADAR system wasn’t able to discern the truck as a stationary object was because of the angle it was facing. RADAR requires a return signal and it’s the reason why stealth planes like the F-117, F-22 and the F-35’s are able to avoid radar is because they deflect the radar return away from the detectors that are supposed to pick up the signal return. The truck was at an odd angle so the radar just bounced off it as it wasn’t there. As for the camera system not picking it up, it was more than likely not trained to recognize that situation and kept on trucking. The fault comes down to the idiot driver that was in the car, just because you have auto-drive doesn’t mean the car is fully autonomous, we just aren’t there. There is a reason you are warned to always keep your hands on the wheel and your eyes on the motherfucking surroundings, auto-drive is an aid not a replacement for the moron sitting in said Tesla. So he can fuck himself and stop blaming Tesla for his fucking mistake, although Tesla needs to put more emphasis on stopping idiot drivers think that their cars can literally drive themselves. I drive a Honda Accord that has the lane keep assist system coupled with the Adaptive Cruise Control and I love them because they allow me to momentarily take my eyes off the road for a moment when I need to do something that requires my immediate attention and be certain that the car will stay in its’s lane and I won’t rear end the car ahead of me if it decides to slow down momentarily. These are tools that are meant to make the drivers life easier, but in no fucking way are they a replacement for an attentive driver looking at their surroundings and be ready for anything. The days of autonomous driving are at least a decade or more away, until then, keep your fucking hands on your wheel and your eyes on a goddamn swivel unless you want to end up like this fucking moron running into an overturned truck.

  13. Meton12765


    17 tuntia sitten

    The traditional autoindustry has had fully autonomous cars with complete autonomy for 30 years. LITERALLY 30 YEARS, you see, they work with the military industrial complex and the first driverless car, with brain of a goddamn stealth yet made its maiden voyage from Dover to Paris with out a single driver input, in 1986. They have class 6 fully autonomous cars in testing, have had for over 15 years now. THEYRE JUST NOT STUPID ENOUGH TO SELL IT, BECAUSE THEY DONT WANT TO KILL PEOPLE. Also, they're in the business of making _CARS_ for _DRIVERS_ not robots to replace ride-share and cab drivers. AND THEY DO SELL IT IN CARS IN APPLICATIONS WHERE IT COUNTS LIKE IN THE MERC S-CLASS AND VOLVO HEAVY TRUCKS WHERE THEIR _RADAR_ ENUMERATION AND OBJECTDIFFERENTIATION SYSTEMS _ENHANCE_ DRIVER CAPACITY NOT DRIVE INTO STATIONARY THINGS, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT GADGETY BULLSXHIT! Besides which, if you want an electric car that doesn't seize and fucking burn it's battery to shit in artic conditions, BUY A VOLVO OR A POLESTAR! MUSK IS A PUSSY AND JUST CANT DO IT!

  14. Edward Evans

    Edward Evans

    17 tuntia sitten


  15. Meton12765


    17 tuntia sitten

    Actually, you're wrong. Radar echo object differentiation and enumeration has been a fucking thing since the goddamn 1960's and with ECM package of the A-12 and later the SR-71. And it's literally a non-issue to fit necessary modern day far more sophisticated computing power and DSP magic into a car. The Merc S-class; LITERALLY DOES. Instead of wasting it's time with selling unsafe, unreliable in tough conditions, poorly built fashion items with gadgety nonsense that nobody wants like non-car-industrialist Musk there. No wonder Apple is making a car... They can sell anything badged with their shit to idiots in California. Here in the real world, we actually build cars that don't fucking crash into literal inanimate objects BUT ACTUALLY HIT THE E-BRAKE FASTER THAN PEOPLE! Volvo fucking runs it's HEAVY TRUCKS WITH RADAR EMERGENCY BRAKING IN _HIGHWAY_ SPEEDS. So, yeah. IT'S YOU WHOSE FUCKED MUSK. STOP BUILDING BULLSHIT AND TRYING TO SELL HIPSTER CRAP TO REAL PEOPLE! And if you want to make a fucking robo-car with no driver. Fuck off, Boston Dynamics does it with LIDAR. So, there.

  16. Noju Kuramu

    Noju Kuramu

    18 tuntia sitten

    Elon is now teaching the AI by running tesla cars to an overturned trucks. He now destroyed 600 models and is now in 4th generation

  17. BrainDebt


    18 tuntia sitten

    Rogan is making Elon very stupid

  18. Galen Hanes

    Galen Hanes

    20 tuntia sitten

    the tesla submarine would have saw that truck trailer

  19. Michael Verhoef

    Michael Verhoef

    20 tuntia sitten

    Fun video. Awesome humor.

  20. wamp wamp

    wamp wamp

    20 tuntia sitten

    You are incorrect about a radar notification having a high resolution. Do some digging. However....they would not be practical in an automotive application 😋.

  21. Heime101


    22 tuntia sitten

    And why the hell was someone just standing there on the freaking highway

  22. Zach Rowe

    Zach Rowe

    23 tuntia sitten

    Eventually autonomous cars won't be able to all rely on individually observing the environment and navigating through it solo. I can see a future where cars are interconnected and act as a swarm. Informing a local group of cars of impending danger ahead and even reacting to potential accidents as one to avoid a pileup. Every car on the road could be aware of one another and anticipating accidents rather than just reacting to them. All while operating at the limit of the cars capabilities in an emergency situation. Elon Musk will also likely be the biggest opponent of communication standardization between cars when the NHTSA comes knocking because it will erase a lot of Teslas moat they've built for themselves.

  23. Paul Curran

    Paul Curran

    Päivä sitten

    Tesla's are slamming brakes on because they see cattle grids on the roads as walls... ☠️😂

  24. The DIY Shop

    The DIY Shop

    Päivä sitten

    Can we just talk about how the tesla went straight into a truck a full page and the dude was fine

  25. Zoltán Boros

    Zoltán Boros

    Päivä sitten

    "Why the Tesla hit the truck? I don't know." Seriously??? The question is the title What was this video about? I didn't even expect you to know, the exact answer would be the Holly grail of machine learning. But I expected something - data, analysis, guess, anything. Maybe you could re-upload this with a little more content because otherwise it's good quality.

  26. Franky Valdebenito

    Franky Valdebenito

    Päivä sitten

    But how did the truck crash

  27. Reapy Boi

    Reapy Boi

    Päivä sitten

    Pov:ur blind

  28. Riccardo Sartori

    Riccardo Sartori

    Päivä sitten

    One objection sir, Toyota uses both lidar and cameras, for example my dad's chr doesn't allow for adaptive cruise and self driving in low visibility conditions because the cameras can't see and therefore can't interpret the objects, so I guess a combination of radar, lidar and cameras would be ideal

  29. Taylor Turk

    Taylor Turk

    Päivä sitten

    driver wasn’t paying attention

  30. Nofer Trunions

    Nofer Trunions

    Päivä sitten

    Obviously, the combination of sensor inputs was something the AI had never seen before. Right? WRONG! If the AI had never seen it before, _it would have slowed down._ The fact that the car did not slow down meant the AI was confident. NOTE: Did you notice the puff of smoke as the car passed what appeared to be the truck driver standing by the side of the road? The car did not slow down for an obvious pedestrian except for a brief momentary brakes lockup (puff of smoke). I'm leaning towards there was a malfunction in the car autonomous systems. *Here ae some other factors regarding the truck (although the pedestrian should really raise the questions.):* SHAPE OF TOP The truck was on it's side showing it's top to the car. If the top was smooth, it could have been mistaken for a bridge which has smooth sides and can cross the road at a similar angle. COLOR OF TOP The color of the top of the truck, its reflectivity, sun angle, etc. could have created something unique - in fact it would be possible for a combination of these make the truck top have the same color as the road which would really be confusing. ANGLE OF TOP It is possible that the angle of the top was such that it reflected the radar away from the transmitter. Early Corvettes were know to have extremely small radar cross-sections because of their angled radiator. Stealth tech is based around let's call it a critical angle - found by Russians in the 30's. If you look at all the angles on F-22 edges, you'll see this angle everywhere. ANGLE + RADAR = Bad if you're unlucky. RELATIVE VELOCITY OF TOP Stationary so could be mistaken for bridge. I wouldn't be surprised that vehicles begin to carry transponders to help autonomous vehicles. Even RFID in license plates.

  31. Nofer Trunions

    Nofer Trunions

    Päivä sitten

    10:16 actual discussion of accident after 10 minutes of autonomous car technology discussion.

  32. Ab Renos

    Ab Renos

    Päivä sitten

    10 years in the future will be looking back at this thinking that humans were the weak point in driving while someone simultaneously hacks the system and drives us all into each other. 😁

  33. Slagg CS

    Slagg CS

    Päivä sitten

    Tell your gf, bf, w/e to take it easy on your eyebrows next time. Looks like your ready to put on your night dress and hit the town. Girls night!!!

  34. Cheesey McCheese

    Cheesey McCheese

    Päivä sitten

    So why did the driver fail to detect they were driving strait into a wall

  35. Dan Luckins

    Dan Luckins

    Päivä sitten

    I think the main reason the car hit the truck is because the driver of the car was not doing his/her job, DRIVING! wake up, dont sleep while driving!

  36. Aljalil


    Päivä sitten

    I’m sorry but chubby Thor with the short hair on this channel is funnier. Use him

  37. Bharath Tony

    Bharath Tony

    Päivä sitten

    What's with mom thing?

  38. Matty Puppy

    Matty Puppy

    Päivä sitten

    Any road? Challenge accepted! You're obligated to fly out here if I get hospitalized! SEE YOU ON MONDAY!

  39. Elias Rohdin

    Elias Rohdin

    Päivä sitten

    10:32 ohno not tesa

  40. w0ttheh3ll


    Päivä sitten

    Lidar can definitely *not* detect if a person is wearing a helmet at any reasonable distance. Have you ever seen a proper visualisation of a Lidar measurement? It's essentially a 360° distance map, but the pixels (measurements) are very sparse, It's notoriously difficult to make sense of.

  41. Bhaskar Noob

    Bhaskar Noob

    Päivä sitten

    I like Elon but sometimes I can't agree with him

  42. Andrew Stambaugh

    Andrew Stambaugh

    Päivä sitten

    I don't doubt that tesla has "blackboxes" built into their cars, not nefariously, but for troubleshooting and development. If the person had lied and the car was on manual mode, tesla would have openly broadcast the findings of that. Ergo, the car was in AI mode at the time leading up to the crash. If I was to wager a guess, I'd say the AI likely mistook the trailer as an overhead sign and fog. When it got close enough for other sensors (ultrasonics etc) to see that it was detecting a much more solid object, then it finally braked, but was (appropriately set to be) too conservative about the swerving through traffic.

  43. mrpmj00


    Päivä sitten

    - crash merging into the same lane as another vehicle Tesla's camera failed to see that both cars entered the same lane and should have backed off. - Texas is snowed in and no electricity = tesla sucks - tesla using up tons of batteries. smartphones for the billions of people are more important than a few rich people in a tesla. To answer your question "who in their right mind buys a car without test driving it?": crazy Tesla owners I'm glad I test drove the Tesla model 3 because I thought it sucked (large turning radius, overly aggressive regenerative braking felt like I slammed on the brakes, stiff ride due to high psi tires, road noise, ugly center stack screen with tiny fonts).

  44. Sleepless Engineer

    Sleepless Engineer

    Päivä sitten

    12:18 A bit off topic, but the ipod was a pathetic piece of sh*t. I have a Casio Cassiopeia E-125 from year 2000, it came out a year before the first ipod, it has a huge backlit color touchscreen, solid state storage with the compact flash card slot, has a jog dial that can shift through music as fast as Apple's sh*tty wheel. Meanwhile the first ipod didn't come out until 2001, had a crappy tiny black and white screen that looks like a gameboy from the 80s, had all kind of harddrive issues because it had a mechanical harddrive, it was a piece of garbage like Apple products still are today. I've even say the Zune is better than the ipod, even thou the Cassiopeia is the best of the three.

  45. Sleepless Engineer

    Sleepless Engineer

    Päivä sitten

    6:06 that is such a stupid statement, it's obviously way more important to have something safe and reliable than something that doesn't look "ugly"

  46. Wassim Dib

    Wassim Dib

    Päivä sitten

    10:22 what was on the road you can see smoke/ dust coming from under the tesla as there was gravel or sand

  47. Funny farm 555

    Funny farm 555

    Päivä sitten

    It hit the truck because they used the MCAS system from the 737 MAX.

  48. чкюьдэт Арлижх вомалйтэц

    чкюьдэт Арлижх вомалйтэц

    Päivä sitten

    06:15 looks like they are paying google drivers to do nothing now

  49. Vervito United

    Vervito United

    Päivä sitten

    He wasted our time

  50. Tiaro Yousant

    Tiaro Yousant

    Päivä sitten

    Tesla just overrated the tech just normal with fancy names

  51. Colin Kozlovich

    Colin Kozlovich

    Päivä sitten

    At minute one, wondering if this brings up LiDAR's issues in the all too common occurrence of rain... 5:57 okay good

  52. FortisProcer


    Päivä sitten

    All these autopilot sensors wreck havoc on my radar/laser detector. Lol!

  53. Sam Hollis

    Sam Hollis

    2 päivää sitten

    4:39 dont watch at full volume

  54. Robert Borjesson

    Robert Borjesson

    2 päivää sitten

    Pulse Doppler Radar. VERY simplified: Stationary objects create no doppler for the pulse from the radar to measure, so it's invisible. This is a very well known effect and used by jets to avoid being locked on to by enemies

  55. Alex O.

    Alex O.

    2 päivää sitten

    Wtf, who tf r u? What is this shit? Where are the real Donut guys?

  56. Rain Man

    Rain Man

    2 päivää sitten

    when people rely on technology too much, this is the result. remember this next time you hail a self driving UBER.

  57. Cuda


    2 päivää sitten

    Or maybe the camera was dirty

  58. VenomTT


    2 päivää sitten

    So we didn't figure out why this happened.......

  59. Russell Larson

    Russell Larson

    2 päivää sitten

    Wow,Plain simple,I say 100% drivers error.He had to have sleeping.

  60. NPC Virtuous

    NPC Virtuous

    2 päivää sitten

    No content, no funny jokes, pos presenter and no cool cars. CLICKBAIT

  61. Doc Tyler

    Doc Tyler

    2 päivää sitten

    Also would the human have been able to avoid the crash if he had been paying attention? If you notice he didn't slam on the brakes until he was right next to the guy standing on the side of the road...?

  62. Darvin Preece

    Darvin Preece

    2 päivää sitten

    To me, It’s plain as to why the Tesla hit it and the driver didn’t see it. Neither one looked. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 The Tesla was looking at a cute Porsche. The Driver was asleep. Just my opinion. Lol Tesla should have used a Truck Monkey as backup!!!

  63. James Von Blitza

    James Von Blitza

    2 päivää sitten

    That guy standing there by the median was jamming the lidar causing the wreck. It’s why it’s a fools errand.

  64. Adrian Martinez

    Adrian Martinez

    2 päivää sitten

    because the driver was distracted

  65. Ariady Putra

    Ariady Putra

    2 päivää sitten

    Zoon Zoom Zune

  66. Gordon Christopher

    Gordon Christopher

    2 päivää sitten

    It also just really unlikely this Tesla was in autopilot at all. It didn't even flinch with a person standing directly in the lane until AFTER it had passed that person, and the AI is absolutely trained to compensate for a human standing in the path of travel. The driver was just lying to get out of liability.

  67. Kiran felix

    Kiran felix

    2 päivää sitten

    Tesla's can be hacked and hijacked.

  68. INDI GO


    2 päivää sitten

    The better question is... Why tf didn't the driver do something

    • Carlos Santos

      Carlos Santos

      Päivä sitten

      He was too busy virtue signaling on Twitter

  69. INDI GO


    2 päivää sitten

    it was trump mistake behind car crash

  70. killersushi99


    2 päivää sitten

    *Sideways Semi Truck in the road. An Over Pass.....Computer "Same Thing". Me: How do I turn all of this "Tech" off?*

  71. vagisha das

    vagisha das

    2 päivää sitten

    Here is another answer.

  72. Frappy


    2 päivää sitten

    Whoever wrote the script for this video, you're not funny

  73. vagisha das

    vagisha das

    2 päivää sitten

    It hit the truck because it was in his way. It is just that simple.😊😶

  74. Jackie Flores

    Jackie Flores

    2 päivää sitten

    what the world really needs is to get these goddamn idiot drivers that dont even want to be driving off the road and onto public transportation or lyfts, and get rid of automatic transmission.

  75. Sonic 4 Ur Mind

    Sonic 4 Ur Mind

    2 päivää sitten

    duh, the truck was on the road sideways.

  76. marie chance

    marie chance

    2 päivää sitten

    And what was that puff of 'smoke' when the car was still 25 feet away from the truck???

    • Dan Luckins

      Dan Luckins

      Päivä sitten

      driver finally looked up and stomped on the brakes

  77. Shannon Fletcher

    Shannon Fletcher

    2 päivää sitten

    I don't care if they answered the question or not, the content is great and the presentation is amazing coming form someone who probably group up in the hood with an IQ of 180.

  78. Sean Workman

    Sean Workman

    2 päivää sitten

    No mention of the person on the road and the burst of tire smoke at that point.

  79. Tom Thumb

    Tom Thumb

    2 päivää sitten

    The computer was confused when the person came so close to the front of the car and it took too much time for it to regain its bearings. Picture you driving down the freeway and seeing a person standing very close to the road, you are wondering what they're doing and focusing on them. Spend too much time doing that, and you won't see what is beyond them soon enough.

  80. Eduardo Riv

    Eduardo Riv

    2 päivää sitten

    Driver must be sleeping to not see that truck and shut down the autopilot.....

  81. MaJieMao


    2 päivää sitten

    If you trust a robot car to drive you around, you'll end up in a truck

  82. Voice Luckan

    Voice Luckan

    2 päivää sitten

    Let’s just face the fact that human beings are getting lazier by the minute. So what, you can’t even bother to drive your own damn car or at the very least keep your eyes on the road ??

  83. Devante Toppin

    Devante Toppin

    2 päivää sitten

    I mean has this been investigated yet? Are we even sure the driver is telling the truth? I highly doubt that the Tesla failed the most basic test for an autonomous vehicle which is to not hit something huge in right in front of it. This tested was tested to hell and back before being approve for use. If the system ever does get confused it errs on the side of caution and has the driver take over better safe than sorry. Also doesn't the auto driving require the driver to move the steering wheel every now and then to keep it active. Doesn't add up imo. The 3 sensors combined would have come up with something and no way they all failed.

  84. Grinner Hester

    Grinner Hester

    2 päivää sitten

    The cause is simple. No driver. There I fixed it.

  85. Roger Smith

    Roger Smith

    2 päivää sitten

    “Farther” is correct. “Further” is incorrect in this context. Farther relates to distance and further refers to degree.

  86. ThunderGaming


    2 päivää sitten

    or u can just drive how fucking difficult is that? it'd be more stressful watching out for the car and to see if it makes a wrong move than driving it ur fucking self

  87. ThunderGaming


    2 päivää sitten

    here's a simple answer: cuz its shit

  88. dsforeva


    3 päivää sitten

    Musk is as stupid as he is brilliant, go figure....

  89. Alex Wright

    Alex Wright

    3 päivää sitten

    Elon talks out his arse half the time

  90. Dampoe Killer

    Dampoe Killer

    3 päivää sitten

    10:28 Tesa Model 3?

  91. Ira Simmons

    Ira Simmons

    3 päivää sitten

    You wearing a royal coda shirt?

  92. ??


    3 päivää sitten

    Plot Twist: the AI was trying to kill the driver

  93. HandsomeAlex25


    3 päivää sitten

    The fault lies in Tesla's marketing. By calling it "self driving" and "autopilot" it gives the impression of full autonomy. It should be considered "advanced lane-keep assist" with "radar cruise control", which is what other manufactures call these similar (though perhaps less advanced) systems. But those honest and genuine phrases are far from S3XY, so they don't. They use diningenuous words to sound like they are way ahead of the competition, and that sells cars - and more importantly for the richest man alive, keeps the share price high.

  94. D-shawn James

    D-shawn James

    3 päivää sitten

    as he said "not pretty to look at" i got an ad about used cars from japan lol

  95. Fruit Bouquet

    Fruit Bouquet

    3 päivää sitten

    Just a thought, can animals hear the ultrasonic sensors? What would they hear or see near a passing by car, or human civilization in general?

  96. Burn The Witch

    Burn The Witch

    3 päivää sitten

    My brother in law wanted to show off autopilot to my wife because she doesn't trust artificial intelligence. A few wiped out cones in a construction zone later came an onslaught of excuses.

  97. Burn The Witch

    Burn The Witch

    3 päivää sitten

    It failed because people with no intelligence trust artificial intelligence.

  98. Jaafar Aljeraiw

    Jaafar Aljeraiw

    3 päivää sitten

    Title: Figuring out why this tesla hit that truck Video: 11:25

  99. Robert Benavidez

    Robert Benavidez

    3 päivää sitten

    Because he thought just because it's on autopilot, he doesn't have to pay attention to the F*cken road! But his insurance will say otherwise.

  100. John Barron

    John Barron

    3 päivää sitten

    LET ME SAVE YOU TIME...Jeremiah doesn’t fuckin know!